Urinary Biomarker Test XBCM Reduces Cystoscopy in High-Grade NMIBC Surveillance

Source: Renal + Urology News
URL: https://www.renalandurologynews.com/news/bladder-cancer-nmibc-urinary-biomarker-test-xbcm-reduces-cystoscopy/

Xpert® Bladder Cancer Monitor (XBCM) can safely replace alternating cystoscopies in high-grade NMIBC surveillance, reducing procedure burden by 56% without compromising oncologic outcomes. The 91% sensitivity and 99% negative predictive value support its use for detecting high-grade recurrences, though 2 pTa high-grade tumors were missed.

Study Design & Population

Multicenter randomized controlled trial (DaBlaCa-15, NCT04100733) enrolling 377 Danish patients with high-grade NMIBC.

  • Intervention arm (n=190): XBCM + urinary cytology every 4 months + annual cystoscopy
  • Control arm (n=187): Cystoscopy + urinary cytology every 4 months
  • Demographics: Predominantly male (83% vs 82%) with median ages of 72.2 and 71.0 years

Key Findings

  • Primary endpoint: Non-inferiority achieved with risk difference 0.08% at 24 months
  • Recurrence rates: 12% intervention vs 11% control over 2 years
  • Cystoscopy reduction: 455 vs 1,029 procedures (56% decrease)
  • Disease progression: 2 vs 3 patients (intervention vs control)

XBCM Performance Metrics

  • Sensitivity: 91%
  • Specificity: 65%
  • PPV: 16%
  • NPV: 99%

Clinical Implications

  • Oncologically safe alternative to standard cystoscopic surveillance in high-grade NMIBC
  • Early detection: Identified recurrence median 8.3 months before cystoscopy in 13/22 patients
  • Upper tract detection: All 4 cases diagnosed via CT after positive XBCM + negative cystoscopy
  • Guideline impact: May support EAU guideline revision on urinary markers in NMIBC follow-up

Limitations

  • Statistical power: Lower-than-expected recurrence rate limits safety conclusions
  • Missed tumors: 2 pTa high-grade recurrences not detected by XBCM
  • Study scope: Limited to single biomarker platform without comparator tests
  • False positives: 16% PPV indicates high false-positive rate

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *